Not just Antefixes, Don't Cheneaux

Bob Kollar asks, "I have an architectural question that has been bugging me for a while–perhaps you can shed some light on this mystery. What ever happened to the antefixes surrounding the roofline of the Carnegie Museum in Oakland? Any idea when/why they were removed? I need to know!

The encyclopedic yet lucid Robert J. Gangewere writes in American Palace of Culture (Pitt Press, 2011), "In 1955, the Institute building saw its first substantial rehabilitation, at a cost of more than $3.25 million: the leaking roof was covered with aluminum, and some decorative details, such as the 1907 copper cheneaus along the roofline, were removed."

Post-War taste found ornament of any kind abhorrent; the greater rigors of historic preservation design and construction had not yet developed. It was common to look at such elements and find them corroded, out-dated and non-functional. Whether they truly contributed to leaks or were simply blamed for them, would be a topic for more detailed research.

I applaud you for describing these as antefixes; the term seems to apply, though an observer might expect antefixes to have separation between them. The term "cheneaux," more commonly applies to a continuous band of ornament. (I truly admire Gangewere's writing on these subjects. The issue of spelling is semantics, not intended as a correction).

You can find cheneaux all around during this period, in the architecture of Henry Hornbostel in Oakland, and in the writing by Walter Kidney that describes it.

Dontcha know.


Recent Posts
Featured Posts
Search By Tags
No tags yet.
Follow Us
  • Twitter Classic
  • Facebook App Icon
  • LinkedIn App Icon
  • Pinterest App Icon
  • Tumblr App Icon
 

1